Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General
c/o 40960 California Oaks Road
Box 281
Murrieta 92562
CALIFORNIA, USA
In Propria Persona
All Rights Reserved
without Prejudice
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
NINTH CIRCUIT
Lynne Meredith et al., ) No. 01-56873
)
Plaintiffs/Appellants,)
v. )
)
Andrew Erath et al., )
)
Defendants/Appellees. )
--------------------------------)
) NOTICE OF MOTION AND
United States ) MOTION REQUESTING CLERK TO
ex relatione ) CERTIFY TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Paul Andrew Mitchell, ) INTERVENOR’S
FORMAL CHALLENGE
) TO THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF
Intervenor. ) CERTAIN ACTS OF
CONGRESS:
)
________________________________) FRAP Rule 44 (last sentence).
COMES NOW the
United States (hereinafter “Intervenor”) ex relatione Paul Andrew
Mitchell, Citizen of ONE OF the
United States of America and Private Attorney General (hereinafter “Relator”),
pursuant to a verbal directive from a Deputy Clerk of this Court, specifically
to request that the Clerk of this Court certify to the Attorney General
Intervenor’s challenges to the constitutionality of certain enumerated Acts of
Congress.
Intervenor hereby incorporates by reference its MOTION FOR INTERVENTION OF RIGHT, as executed on April 20, 2002 A.D., as if set forth fully herein. See REMEDY REQUESTED in said MOTION.
Intervenor now formally challenges the constitutionality of:
(1) the federal Jury Selection and Service Act at
28 U.S.C. 1865(b)(1), for expressly discriminating in favor of federal citizens
and against Citizens of the United States of America, in violation of the
federal policy at 28 U.S.C. 1861, in violation of Article III, Section 2,
Clause 3, and in violation of the Sixth Amendment;
(2) the Rules Enabling Act at 28 U.S.C. 2072(b),
for violating Article I, Section 1, and the Separation of Powers Doctrine;
(3) all income tax provisions of the Internal
Revenue Code, for deliberate vagueness in violation of the Ninth Amendment and
the Nature and Cause Clause in the Sixth Amendment; and,
(4)
the Act of June 25,
1948, 62 Stat. 869 et seq., also known as Title 28 of the United States
Code, for vagueness, for violating the ex post facto prohibition, for
violating the Separation of Powers Doctrine, and for violating the principle
that statutes granting original jurisdiction to federal courts must be strictly
construed.
Concurrently with the instant appeal, the United States has also exercised its statutory right to intervene ex rel. Paul Andrew Mitchell, Private Attorney General, in the related cases of: Meredith et al. v. Erath et al., Ninth Circuit docket number #02-55021; USA v. Meredith et al., USDC Los Angeles docket number #CR 02‑0372; and People of California ex rel. Bybee et al. v. Andrew Erath et al., DCUS Santa Ana docket number #SA CV 02‑0382 GLT(ANx).
Pursuant to the last sentence in Rule 44 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (“FRAP”), Intervenor respectfully requests the Clerk of this Court to certify to the U.S. Attorney General Intervenor’s proper challenge to the constitutionality of the specific Acts of Congress enumerated above.
I,
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty of
perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the “United
States” (federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is
true and correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge,
and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1). See Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws
and Treaties are all the supreme Law of the Land).
Dated: May 15,
2002 A.D.
Signed: /s/ Paul
Andrew Mitchell
______________________________________________
Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, Private Attorney General
I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby certify,
under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America,
without the “United States” (federal government), that I am at least 18
years of age, a Citizen of ONE OF the United States of America, and that I personally served the
following document(s):
FRAP Rule 44 (last sentence)
by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in
first class United States Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to the
following:
Clerk of Court (5x)
Attention: Cathy Catterson
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
P.O. Box 193939
San Francisco 94119-3939
CALIFORNIA, USA
c/o P.O. Box 370
Sunset Beach 90742
CALIFORNIA, USA
c/o Marcia J. Brewer
300 Corporate Pointe, Suite 330
Culver City 90230
CALIFORNIA, USA
c/o P.O. Box 370
Sunset Beach 90742
CALIFORNIA, USA
21213-B Hawthorne Blvd., #5361
Torrance 90503
CALIFORNIA, USA
c/o Office of Regional Inspector
Internal Revenue Service
P.O. Box 6238
Laguna Niguel 92607
CALIFORNIA, USA
Richard Stack and Darwin Thomas Rebecca
Sparkman
300 North Los Angeles Street Internal Revenue Service
Room 7211, Federal Building 24000 Avila Road, #3314
Los Angeles 90012 Laguna Niguel 92607
CALIFORNIA, USA CALIFORNIA, USA
Gretchen W. Wolfinger Victor
Song
U.S. Department of Justice Internal Revenue Service
Appellate Section 24000 Avila Road, #3314
P.O. Box 502 Laguna Niguel 92607
Washington 20044 CALIFORNIA, USA
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, USA
Patricia Mazon
Office of the Chief Counsel
Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service
501 West Ocean Boulevard c/o 24000 Avila Road
Long Beach Laguna Niguel 92607
CALIFORNIA, USA CALIFORNIA, USA
Courtesy Copies to:
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Room 5614
Washington 20530-0001
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, USA
Judge Alex Kozinski (supervising)
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
P.O. Box 91510
Pasadena 91109-1510
CALIFORNIA, USA
[See USPS Publication #221 for addressing instructions.]
Dated: May 15, 2002 A.D.
Signed: /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
______________________________________________
Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, Private Attorney General